47 Cadogan Square, London, SW1X 0HX
LON/00AW/LDC/2026/0021 · dispensation from consultation · Kensington and Chelsea · decided 28 Apr 2026
The Tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for urgent replacement of the communal heating boiler at 47 Cadogan Square, as the boiler supplies heating to the flats and the work was urgent.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | 47 Cadogan Square Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Anais Dhuez- Estazia Ltd |
| Building | A block, 6 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
contains six flats which vary in size from one bedroom to four bedroom
- freeholder
Applicant : 47 Cadogan Square Ltd (landlord)
- agent
Anais Dhuez- Estazia Ltd (Property
- outcome
the Tribunal grants dispensation from with the statutory requirement to consult
- s20
the Tribunal determines, pursuant to section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, that it is reasonable to dispense with the statutory consultation requirements
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.