Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near SM1 2TN

46 St James Road, Sutton, Surrey SM1 2TN

LON/00BF/LCP/2023/0004 · LCP · Sutton · decided 31 Jul 2023

The tribunal decided that the RTM company must pay the landlord's reasonable costs arising from the right to manage acquisition, finding the claimed costs reasonable and due.

OutcomeOther decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedLandlord or management company
Freeholder / landlordnot a company, or not stated
Management company46 St James Road RTM Company Limited
Managing agentnone named
BuildingA block
Service charge years in disputenot stated
Items in disputelegal and professional fees
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demanded£1,667
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderedthe respondent to pay the applicant's costs of £1667 including VAT

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

management company
Respondent 46 St James Road RTM Company Limited
outcome
Determination of costs pursuant to s.88(2)
total demanded
The total sought including VAT was £1667.
costs
the costs claimed by the Applicants are entirely reasonable applying the criteria in subsection (2) and the Tribunal has no hesitation in confirming that the costs are due and should be paid by the Respondents.

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.