46 Auriol Road, London W14 0SR
LON/00AN/LSC/2020/0366 · service charges · Hammersmith and Fulham · decided 9 May 2022
figures not yet checkedThe Tribunal found most interim service charge estimates for 2020/21 reasonable, but disallowed the £200 company secretary fee and found no reasonable estimate for communal electricity, and made a section 20C order in the leaseholder's favour.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Other |
| Freeholder / landlord | Auriol Management Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 4 flats · 2 decisions about this building |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2020 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, cleaning and grounds, insurance, legal and professional fees, major works, management fees, other, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund, utilities |
| Items disallowed or reduced | administration charges, other, utilities |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
converted into four flats (lower ground, ground floor, first floor and second floor)
- freeholder
The freeholder is Auriol Management Ltd, a company owned by the leaseholders.
- years
interim service charge for the service charge year 2020/21
- outcome
The sum of £100 was not a reasonable estimate for communal electricity. No estimated sum would have been reasonable.
- items reduced
The additional sum of £200 was not reasonable (as not payable under the leases or management order).
- s20c
(1) under section 20C of the 1985 Act that the costs incurred by the Respondent in proceedings before the Tribunal are not to be taken into account in determining the amount of any service charge payable by the Applicant
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.