Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near WA12 9ER

46-56 Vista Road, Newton-le-Willows, WA12 9ER

MAN/00BZ/LSC/2019/0109 · service charges · St. Helens · decided 6 Feb 2023

figures not yet checked

The tribunal decided that the actual service costs incurred for 2019-20, rather than the higher budgeted figure, are reasonably incurred at reasonable cost, and made a section 20C order protecting the leaseholders from the landlord's legal costs being added to the service charge.

OutcomeReduced
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Order made
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedLeaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlordVista Road Management Company Ltd
Management companynone named
Managing agentnone named
BuildingA block, 6 flats
Service charge years in dispute2019
Items in disputereserve fund
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demanded£16,766
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
46-56, Vista Road is a block of 6 residential flats
freeholder
Vista Road Management Company Ltd
years
the 2019-20 budget
outcome
The service costs actually incurred, and not the budgeted costs
total demanded
showing a predicted expenditure of £16,766.00
s20c
An order is made under Section 20C

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.