46-52 Carlingford Drive, Westcliff on Sea, Essex, SS0 0SB
CAM/00KF/LDC/2023/0002 · dispensation from consultation · Southend-on-Sea · decided 2 Mar 2023
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the s.20 consultation requirements for exterior roof, chimney and gutter repairs at the four flats, with total recoverable costs capped at £4,000 including fees, excluding professional fees and the cost of the earlier survey.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Appointmoor Property Management Services Ltd |
| Building | A block, 4 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £4,000 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
Flats 46, 48, 50 and 52 together appear to form a purpose built building of four flats
- agent
through its managing agent Appointmoor Property
- outcome
The Tribunal grants dispensation from the requirements on the applicant
- total demanded
price of these external works including scaffolding and any surveyors fees was £4000 exactly
- s20
The Tribunal grants dispensation from the requirements on the applicant
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.