46-130 Wheelwright House, Palgrave Road, Bedford MK42 9BX
CAM/00KB/LUS/2020/0001 · LUS · Bedford · decided 4 Mar 2021
The tribunal determined that £25,992.10 of uncommitted service charges held by the respondent at the acquisition date is payable to the RTM company under section 94 of the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | RTM company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | First Management Ltd trading as Hurst Managements |
| Building | A block, 130 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2017, 2018, 2019 |
| Items in dispute | insurance, management fees, reserve fund |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | £25,992.10 |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
Each building has 130 flats, arranged in six blocks, numbered A to F.
- agent
The respondent was represented by Mark [name] of First Management Ltd trading as Hurst Managements.
- years
service charges for 2017, 2018 and 2019
- outcome
The Tribunal determines £25,992.10 is payable by the respondent in respect of the balance due of uncommitted service charges as at the acquisition date.
- total payable
The Tribunal determines £25,992.10 is payable by the respondent
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
Later rulings on the same case (costs, section 20C, permission to appeal): 4 Mar 2021.
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.