Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near RM18 8YP

45 Stanford House, Princess Margaret Road, East Tilbury RM18 8YP

CAM/00KG/LSC/2019/0053 · service charges · Thurrock · decided 21 Nov 2019

The court held that the landlord's legal costs of recovering arrears, which the defendant had paid within days of the claim being issued, were disproportionate, and allowed only £2 500 of them.

OutcomeReduced
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedLandlord or management company
Freeholder / landlordnot a company, or not stated
Management companynone named
Managing agentnone named
BuildingOne flat
Service charge years in dispute2019
Items in disputeadministration charges, legal and professional fees
Items disallowed or reducedadministration charges, legal and professional fees
Total demanded£3
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderedthe respondent to pay the applicant's costs of £2 500 inclusive of VAT, subject to VAT position

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

outcome
A proportionate amount, in the circumstances, is £2 500
items reduced
A proportionate amount, in the circumstances, is £2 500
costs
A proportionate amount, in the circumstances, is £2 500 (inclusive of VAT, if the claimant's solicitors can confirm that their client is not VAT registered and cannot set that element off)

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.