45-61 Coleridge Way (odd numbers), Oakham, LE15 6GA
BIR/00FP/LUS/2022/0001 · LUS · Rutland · decided 16 Nov 2023
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal ordered the management company to pay the RTM company £12,852.00 in costs and reimburse £300 in fees because its unreasonable conduct delayed payment of accrued service charges, and it also ordered that the leaseholders need not pay the management company's litigation costs of these proceedings through the service charge or as administration charges.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | RTM company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Whitelake Properties Investment Limited |
| Management company | Orchid at Oakham Management Company Limited Ltd |
| Managing agent | Firstport Property Services Limited |
| Building | A block, 9 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | reserve fund, legal and professional fees, administration charges |
| Items disallowed or reduced | administration charges |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the respondent to pay the applicant rule 13(1)(b) costs of £12,852.00 and reimburse the application fee of £100 and hear |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The subject properties are nine leasehold apartments in a block
- freeholder
The freeholder of the development, Whitelake Properties Investment Limited
- management company
[name] at Oakham Management
- agent
employed Firstport Property Services Limited
- outcome
The dispute that prompted the section 94(3) application was settled on 27
- s20c
are not to be regarded as relevant costs to
- costs
orders the Respondent to pay rule 13(1)(b) costs in the sum of £12,852.00
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.