44 Wivenhoe House, Fairways, Ferndown, Dorset BH22 8BB
CHI/19UD/LAC/2020/0011 · administration charges · Dorset · decided 10 May 2021
The tribunal found the leaseholder is not liable to pay £2,223.50 of administration charges for 2005 to 2017 because the lease does not allow them, and made orders preventing the landlord from recovering its costs of the case through the service charge or as an administration charge, with the landlord to repay the £100 application fee.
| Outcome | Not payable |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Fairways Residents (Ferndown) Limited |
| Management company | Fairways Residents (Ferndown) Limited |
| Managing agent | Burns Management |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2005, 2017 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges |
| Items disallowed or reduced | administration charges |
| Total demanded | £2,223.50 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the respondent to reimburse the applicant's application fee £100 |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
The landlord of that lease was [name] (Ferndown) Limited (4169046)
- agent
the current agent, Burns Management
- years
for the period 2005 to 2017
- outcome
is not liable to pay administration charges totalling £2223.50
- items reduced
is not liable to pay administration charges totalling £2223.50
- total demanded
administration charges imposed by the Lessor (amounting to £2,223.50)
- s20c
The Tribunal considers it just and equitable in view of the outcome of the case to make orders under section 20C of the 1985 Act
- costs
The Tribunal orders the Respondent to reimburse the applicant with £100 application fee within 28 days
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.