44 – 55 St Pauls Rise, London N13 6LB
LON/00AK/LAM/2021/0027 · appointment of a manager · Enfield · decided 29 Mar 2022
The tribunal dismissed the leaseholder's application for appointment of a manager because the statutory preliminary notice under section 22 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987 was not served and dispensation was refused, and no section 20C order was made.
| Outcome | Dismissed or struck out |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Limited (1) BJE London Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | BJE London Limited |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | not stated |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- agent
BJE London Limited (BJE), the managing agent, as Respondent
- outcome
The tribunal dismisses the application for an appointment of a manager by Ms [name]
- s20c
No order shall be made under section 20C Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 for the reasons set out below.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.