43-57 Onslow Square, London, SW7 3LR
LON/00AW/LDC/2019/0211 · dispensation from consultation · Kensington and Chelsea · decided 15 Jan 2020
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for urgent roof survey and repair works at the building because the works were necessary and needed to be done quickly.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Savills UK Limited |
| Building | A block, 27 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
converted to 27 flats over 6 storeys
- agent
Representative Savills UK Limited
- outcome
The Tribunal grants dispensation from all the consultation requirements under S.20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 in relation to the roof survey, repairs and associated costs.
- s20
The Tribunal grants dispensation from all the consultation requirements under S.20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.