429 New Cross Road, London, SE14 6A
LON/00AZ/LCP/2024/0024 · LCP · Lewisham · decided 19 Mar 2026
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal decided that the RTM company is not liable for the landlord's costs of the right to manage claim, because the landlord held only an equitable interest when the claim notice was given.
| Outcome | Dismissed or struck out |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Assethold Limited |
| Management company | New Cross Road RTM Company Ltd |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | not stated |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £1,952.50 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Applicant : Assethold Limited
- outcome
The Tribunal finds that the applicant was not a landlord under a lease of the premises when the claim notice was given as it only had an equitable interest in the property, not a legal interest.
- total demanded
This Costs Application applies only in relation to £1,952.50 plus VAT of costs incurred by the landlord
- total payable
the respondent RTM company has no liability for any of the applicant's costs
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.