42 Fore Street, Bovey Tracey, Newton Abbot, TQ13 9AD
CHI/18UH/LDC/2021/0082 · dispensation from consultation · Teignbridge · decided 21 Oct 2021
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for scaffolding, chimney repointing and render and plaster repairs at the building, subject to the landlord obtaining competitive quotations before the works start.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | Carrick Johnson Management Services Ltd |
| Managing agent | Carrick Johnson Management Services Ltd |
| Building | A block, 4 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
the Property has three storeys comprising 4 flats and 1 shop
- management company
Carrick Johnson Management Services Ltd
- agent
They lack confidence in the Applicants’ agent
- outcome
The Tribunal grants dispensation from the consultation requirements of S.20 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
- s20
The Tribunal grants dispensation from the consultation requirements of S.20 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.