42 Burrell Towers, Albany Road, London E10 7EH
LON/00BH/LSC/2019/0166 · service charges · Waltham Forest · decided 16 Dec 2019
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal found the major works service charges for 2013 and 2014 payable, because the demands and section 20B(2) notices were in all probability posted and deemed received, and it made an order under section 20C so the landlord's costs cannot be added to the service charge.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 44 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2013, 2014 |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
containing in total 44 flats
- years
In the event, it became apparent that the contested service charges were those relating to major works demanded in 2013 and 2014
- outcome
the sums claimed by the Respondent are payable by the Applicant.
- s20c
The application for an order under section 20C of the 1985 Act is allowed.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.