42, 58 and 152 Haven Green Court, Haven Green, London W5 2UY
LON/00AJ/LSC/2023/0018 · service charges · Ealing · decided 25 Oct 2023
figures not yet checkedNo plain-English summary for this decision yet. See the original.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Haven Green Court Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Lamberts Chartered Surveyors |
| Building | A block, 80 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, cleaning and grounds, insurance, management fees, other, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund, utilities |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
5-storey purpose-built block of 80 flats
- freeholder
Respondent : [name] Green Court Ltd
- agent
Lamberts Chartered Surveyors are the managing agents
- years
for the 8 years 2015- 2023
- outcome
The service charges challenged in these proceedings are reasonable and payable by the Applicants to the Respondent.
- s20c
However, the application having entirely failed, there is no basis for making either order.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.