42-45 Church Street, Ware, Hertfordshire SG12 9EW
CAM/22UD/LDC/2024/0618 · dispensation from consultation · East Hertfordshire · decided 13 Feb 2025
The tribunal granted the landlords retrospective dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for urgent roof repairs at the property, so the leaseholders' contributions are not capped on that ground; this decision does not determine whether the cost is reasonable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 4 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
4 leasehold flats on the first-floor access via 2 communal
- outcome
The Tribunal is satisfied that it is reasonable to dispense with compliance with
- s20
The Tribunal is satisfied that it is reasonable to dispense with compliance with
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.