41/50 Prince of Wales Mansions, SW11 4BG
LON/00BJ/LDC/2023/0249 · dispensation from consultation · Wandsworth · decided 5 Feb 2024
The tribunal granted the freeholder dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for urgent additional roof repairs, subject to the cost not exceeding £40,000 plus VAT without a further application.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Prince of Wales Mansions Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 18 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The application lists 18 flats which have been sold on long lease.
- freeholder
Applicant : [name] of Wales Mansions Limited
- outcome
The tribunal exercises its discretion to grant dispensation from the consultation requirements of s20ZA in respect of the works required to repair a leaking roof.
- s20
The tribunal exercises its discretion to grant dispensation from the consultation requirements of s20ZA in respect of the works required to repair a leaking roof.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.