41 Park Heights, Constitution Hill, Woking, GU22 7RT

· other · Woking · decided 18 May 2020

figures not yet checked

The tribunal found service charges of £2876.68 reasonable and recoverable but held the administration charges of £706.00 not payable, and made an order that the landlord's costs of the tribunal proceedings cannot be added to the service charge.

Outcome	Reduced
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)	Order made
Section 20 consultation	Not in issue
Who applied	Landlord or management company
Freeholder / landlord	Fairhold Artemis Limited
Management company	none named
Managing agent	none named
Building	One flat
Service charge years in dispute	not stated
Items in dispute	administration charges, other
Items disallowed or reduced	administration charges
Total demanded	not stated as one figure
Total found payable	£2,876.68
Fees or costs ordered	none stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

outcome: The Respondent is not liable for the administration charges of £706.00.
items reduced: The Respondent is not liable for the administration charges of £706.00.
total payable: the Respondent is liable to the Second Applicant for service charges in the sum of £2876.68.
s20c: the Tribunal finds that it is just and equitable in the circumstances for an order to be made under section 20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.