41-50 Lawns Court, The Avenue, Wembley, Middx., HA9 9PN
LON/00AE/LDC/2019/0054 · dispensation from consultation · Brent · decided 30 May 2019
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for drainage, paving and retaining wall repair works at this 10-flat block, as the works were urgent to keep insurance cover in place.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | ABC BM Ltd. |
| Building | A block, 10 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The property is a block of 10 purpose built flats.
- agent
Representative : [name] (ABC BM Ltd.)
- outcome
The Tribunal grants dispensation from the requirements on the Applicant to consult the Respondents under S.20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, in respect of the application.
- s20
the Tribunal is satisfied that it is reasonable to dispense with requirements and determines that those parts of the consultation process under the Act
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.