Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near HA9 9PN

41-50 Lawns Court, The Avenue, Wembley HA9 9PN

LON/00AE/LSC/2018/0386 · service charges · Brent · decided 15 Apr 2019

The tribunal found that the landlord complied with the statutory consultation requirements for the proposed major works, on the assumption the contract is awarded to Hammer & Chisel on its existing quote, and that the managing agents' costs of the proceedings cannot be charged through the service charge.

OutcomeOther decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Refused
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedLandlord or management company
Freeholder / landlordnot a company, or not stated
Management companynone named
Managing agentnone named
BuildingA block
Service charge years in disputenot stated
Items in disputemajor works
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderedRespondents to reimburse application fee of £100 and hearing fee of £200

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

outcome
(1) The consultation requirements have been complied in relation to the works which are the subject of this application
s20c
(3) The Tribunal makes no cost order under section 20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
costs
the Respondents to reimburse to the Applicant the application fee of £100 and the hearing fee of £200

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.