400, 402, 404 Uxbridge Road & 1a, 1b and 1c, Oaklands Grove, London, W12 0JD
LON/00AN/LDC/2020/0075 · dispensation from consultation · Hammersmith and Fulham · decided 1 Oct 2020
The Tribunal granted dispensation from the consultation requirements only for emergency structural works and opening-up works already carried out, and for related professional fees, but refused dispensation for all other matters.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Safe Property Management |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | other, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | other, repairs and maintenance |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Nextbridge Capital Limited (2)
- agent
Representative : Safe Property Management
- outcome
The decision of the Tribunal is that the application for dispensation from the consultation requirements be GRANTED in respect of
- items reduced
Dispensation in respect of all other matters is REFUSED.
- s20
The decision of the Tribunal is that the application for dispensation from the consultation requirements be GRANTED in respect of
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.