4 Wycliffe Close, Cheshunt, Waltham Cross, Hertfordshire, EN8 0FJ
CAM/26UB/LSC/2019/0054 · service charges · Broxbourne · decided 20 Dec 2019
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal found the estimated 2019/2020 service charges reasonable, but limited the applicants' contribution to the reserve fund to £250.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Hoxa Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2019 |
| Items in dispute | cleaning and grounds, insurance, management fees, other, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund |
| Items disallowed or reduced | reserve fund |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Respondent : Hoxa Ltd
- years
seek a determination for a single year, 2019/2020
- outcome
except for the Applicants’ contribution to the reserve fund, which shall be limited to £250.
- items reduced
except for the Applicants’ contribution to the reserve fund, which shall be limited to £250.
- s20c
No application is made under s.20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.