Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near EN8 0FJ

4 Wycliffe Close, Cheshunt, Waltham Cross, Hertfordshire, EN8 0FJ

CAM/26UB/LSC/2019/0054 · service charges · Broxbourne · decided 20 Dec 2019

figures not yet checked

The tribunal found the estimated 2019/2020 service charges reasonable, but limited the applicants' contribution to the reserve fund to £250.

OutcomeReduced
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Refused
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedLeaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlordHoxa Ltd
Management companynone named
Managing agentnone named
BuildingOne flat
Service charge years in dispute2019
Items in disputecleaning and grounds, insurance, management fees, other, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund
Items disallowed or reducedreserve fund
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

freeholder
Respondent : Hoxa Ltd
years
seek a determination for a single year, 2019/2020
outcome
except for the Applicants’ contribution to the reserve fund, which shall be limited to £250.
items reduced
except for the Applicants’ contribution to the reserve fund, which shall be limited to £250.
s20c
No application is made under s.20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.