4 The Clock Tower, Goldring Way, Napsbury Park, St Albans AL2 1GF
CAM/26UG/LIS/2019/0017 · LIS · St Albans · decided 15 Nov 2019
The tribunal found the leaseholder was due a refund of about £4,910 because the service charge percentage was wrongly calculated, and ordered the management company to repay his £100 application fee and not pass its tribunal costs to him through the service charge.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | Hurford Salvi Carr Property Management Ltd |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 403 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2011, 2012 |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | other |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the respondent to pay the applicant £100 tribunal fees |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- management company
1.Hurford Salvi Carr Property Management Ltd
- years
in respect of the service charge years 2011/12 through to the current year
- outcome
the tribunal determines that the Applicant is due a refund from the First Respondent of £4,910.91
- items reduced
the tribunal determines that the Applicant is due a refund from the First Respondent of £4,910.91
- s20c
The tribunal makes an order under section 20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 so that none of the First Respondent’s costs of the tribunal proceedings may be passed to the lessees through any service charge.
- costs
the First Respondent shall pay the Applicant £100 within 28 days of this Decision, in respect of the reimbursement of the tribunal fees paid by the Applicant.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.