4 Monument Way, Bodmin, Cornwall PL31 1NZ
CHI/00HE/LSC/2021/0040 · service charges · Cornwall · decided 29 Sep 2021
The Tribunal had no jurisdiction because the service charge was a fixed charge rather than a variable one, so the application was struck out, and the landlord's costs of the proceedings were barred from being added to the service charge.
| Outcome | Dismissed or struck out |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not clear |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2015 |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- years
Tenants’ application for the determination of reasonableness of service charges for the years from 1 April 2015 to date.
- outcome
the application is struck out.
- s20c
The Tribunal, accordingly, allows the application under Section 20c of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 and Schedule 11 Paragraph 5A Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.