4 Mondial Way, Harlington, Hayes, Middlesex, UB3 5AR
LON/00AS/LCP/2022/0004 · LCP · Hillingdon · decided 1 Aug 2022
The tribunal ordered the RTM company to pay the landlord's costs of £3,821.16 incurred in response to its right to manage claim, limited to costs up to the deemed withdrawal date.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | 4 Mondial Way RTM Company Limited |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2021 |
| Items in dispute | not stated |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | £3,821.16 |
| Fees or costs ordered | the respondent to pay the applicant's RTM costs of £3,821.16 (inclusive of VAT of £636.86) |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- management company
Respondent : 4 Mondial Way RTM Company Limited
- outcome
The Tribunal determines that the Respondent is to pay the Applicant’s costs under section 88(4) of the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 in the sum of £3,821.16 (inclusive of VAT of £636.86).
- total payable
in the sum of £3,821.16 (inclusive of VAT of £636.86)
- costs
the Respondent is to pay the Applicant’s costs under section 88(4) of the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 in the sum of £3,821.16 (inclusive of VAT of £636.86).
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.