4 Collett Close, Stourbridge, West Midlands DY8 4HS
BIR/00CR/LIS/2019/0047 · LIS · Dudley · decided 10 Jan 2020
The tribunal reduced the grounds maintenance costs by 40% and the management charges by 10%, finding £334.91 in unpaid estate charges plus £67.01 interest and £220.00 costs payable by the defendants.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | Stonewater (2) Limited |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | An estate, 293 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 |
| Items in dispute | cleaning and grounds, management fees |
| Items disallowed or reduced | cleaning and grounds, management fees |
| Total demanded | £662 |
| Total found payable | £519.41 |
| Fees or costs ordered | the respondent to pay the applicant £220.00 for court fee, legal representative's costs and hearing fee |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
comprising 293 residential properties (houses and flats)
- management company
Claimant : Stonewater (2) Limited
- years
comprises unpaid estate charges relating to the years 2014/2015 to 2017/2018.
- outcome
should be discounted by 40 per cent.
- items reduced
should be discounted by 40 per cent.
- total demanded
compared with the sum of £662.00
- total payable
are therefore £519.41
- costs
Total: £220.00
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.