39 Harold Road,Crystal Palace,London SE19 3PL
LON/00AH/LSC/2024/0042 · service charges · Croydon · decided 9 Oct 2024
The tribunal found the proposed major works costs of £341,326.02 reasonable and payable by the leaseholders for the service charge year ending December 2024, and ordered them to refund the landlord's tribunal fees of £300.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Green Crescent Estates Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 6 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2024 |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £341,325.03 |
| Total found payable | £341,326.02 |
| Fees or costs ordered | the respondents to reimburse the applicant's tribunal fees £300 |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The Respondents hold long leases of the 6 flats in the property
- freeholder
The Applicant Green Crescent Estates Limited seeks a determination pursuant
- agent
of Avon Estates (London) Limited
- years
the service charge year ending December 2024
- outcome
is a reasonable sum to incur in respect of major works
- total demanded
Total £341,325.03
- total payable
the sum of £341,326.02 is a reasonable sum to
- costs
the Respondents shall pay the Applicant £300
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.