Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near TN34 1LX

39-40 Cornwallis Gardens, Hastings TN34 1LX

CHI/21UD/LSC/2023/0060 · service charges · Hastings · decided 23 Jan 2024

The Tribunal determined that the Respondent's service charge share is 7% as the lease provides, not the informal 10%, that reserve fund payments are not payable, and that the other charges for 2017 to 2022 are payable as claimed.

OutcomeReduced
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not clear
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedLandlord or management company
Freeholder / landlordnot a company, or not stated
Management companyCornwallis Gardens Residents Association Ltd
Managing agentnone named
BuildingA block, 10 flats
Service charge years in dispute2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022
Items in disputeadministration charges, insurance, major works, management fees, other, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund, utilities
Items disallowed or reducedreserve fund
Total demanded£10,897.80
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
The property comprises a Victorian house converted into 10 flats.
years
for the years 2017 to 2022
outcome
finds that reserve fund payments are not payable.
items reduced
finds that reserve fund payments are not payable.
total demanded
The application sets out the total amount said to be due of £10,897.80.

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.