384 Uxbridge Road, London W12 7LL
LON/00AN/LAM/2018/0014 · appointment of a manager · Hammersmith and Fulham · decided 17 Jan 2019
The tribunal appointed the applicant as interim manager for August to September 2018, granted dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for building and roof repairs costing £16,754.78, allowed the interim manager a 10% fee, and declined to include the applicant's £4,000 legal costs in the order.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Other |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 3 flats · 3 decisions about this building |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2018 |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | costs of £4,000 against the a party |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
the 3 residential flats above and common parts (if any)
- outcome
It is hereby ordered as follows:
- s20
The applicant shall be granted dispensation under S.20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 from the consultation requirements provided by section 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 in relation to the works.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.