38 Norfolk House Road, Streatham Common, London, SW16 1JH
LON/00AY/LDC/2023/0267 · dispensation from consultation · Lambeth · decided 13 Feb 2024
The tribunal granted the landlord retrospective dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for urgent roof works, including replacing a Velux window, because no leaseholder was prejudiced and none objected; the decision does not deal with whether the costs are payable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Southern Land Securities Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Together Property Management |
| Building | One flat, 3 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
now converted to 3 flats
- freeholder
Southern Land Securities Ltd
- agent
Together Property Management
- outcome
The tribunal exercises its discretion to grant dispensation from the consultation requirements of s20ZA in respect of the works required to
- s20
The tribunal exercises its discretion to grant dispensation from the consultation requirements of s20ZA in respect of the works required to
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.