Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near SW1X 0DH

38 Lennox Gardens, London, SW1X 0DH

LON/00AW/LDC/2021/0010 · dispensation from consultation · Kensington and Chelsea · decided 30 Mar 2021

The tribunal granted the landlord retrospective dispensation, unconditionally, from the statutory consultation requirements for urgent gutter repair and scaffolding works at the building.

OutcomeOther decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationDispensation granted
Who appliedLandlord or management company
Freeholder / landlordThe Wellcome Trust Limited
Management companynone named
Managing agentSavills (UK) Ltd
BuildingOne flat, 7 flats · 2 decisions about this building
Service charge years in disputenot stated
Items in disputerepairs and maintenance
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
converted into 7 flats
freeholder
Applicant : The Wellcome Trust Limited
agent
Savills (UK) Ltd, the Applicant’s managing agents
outcome
The tribunal dispenses unconditionally with those of the consultation requirements not complied with by the Applicant
s20
The tribunal dispenses unconditionally with those of the consultation requirements not complied with by the Applicant in respect of the qualifying works

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.