38 Ferndale, Burgess Hill, RH15 0HG
CHI/45UG/LAM/2020/0010 · appointment of a manager · Mid Sussex · decided 30 Nov 2020
No plain-English summary for this decision yet. See the original.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 2 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | insurance, management fees, repairs and maintenance, cleaning and grounds, reserve fund, legal and professional fees |
| Items disallowed or reduced | repairs and maintenance |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the applicant's application for costs under rule 13 declined; no costs ordered |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The Property is a period semi-detached house that has been converted into two flats.
- outcome
The Tribunal is satisfied upon the basis of the evidence before it, that there has been a long-standing failure on the part of the Second and Third Respondents as joint freeholders of the Property to engage in the proper repair and maintenance of the Property
- costs
The Tribunal declines to make an Order for costs as requested by the Applicant pursuant to rule 13 of the Tribunal Procedure ([name] Tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.