38-39 Rutland Gate, London SW7 1PD and 51-52 Montpelier Walk, London SW7 1JH
LON/00BK/LSC/2025/0939 · service charges · Westminster · decided 2 Apr 2026
figures not yet checkedThe Tribunal decided that the £244,651 inclusive of VAT charged for lift renovation works is reasonable and payable by the lessees, and made partial section 20C orders so that the landlord may not pass some of its tribunal costs through the service charge.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Esskay Management Services |
| Building | A block, 12 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2023, 2024, 2025 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, legal and professional fees, major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £244,651 |
| Total found payable | £244,651 |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The property comprises 12 flats in 38-39 Rutland Gate, London SW7
- agent
Mr [name], Property Manager, Esskay Management Services
- years
in respect of the service charge year end 2023 and 2024 and for the future year end 2025
- outcome
The Tribunal determines that the sum of £244,651 inclusive of VAT claimed by the Applicant is payable by the Respondents
- total demanded
the sum of £244,651 inclusive of VAT claimed by the Applicant
- total payable
The Tribunal determines that the sum of £244,651 inclusive of VAT claimed by the Applicant is payable by the Respondents
- s20c
The Tribunal makes orders under section 20C of the Landlord and
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.