Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near EN2 8EB

37B Chase Green Avenue, Enfield EN2 8EB

LON/00AK/LSC/2025/0644 · service charges · Enfield · decided 14 Sep 2025

The tribunal reduced the management fee to £140 per annum for 2023 and 2024 and found the guttering works not payable by the leaseholder, while other charges were found reasonable and payable, and made a section 20C order.

OutcomeReduced
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Order made
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedLeaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlordStefos Estates Limited
Management companynone named
Managing agentnone named
BuildingOne flat, 4 flats
Service charge years in dispute2023, 2024
Items in disputeadministration charges, cleaning and grounds, insurance, management fees, other, repairs and maintenance
Items disallowed or reducedmanagement fees, other
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
a converted Edwardian house consisting of four flats
freeholder
Respondent : Stefos Estates Limited
years
the service charge year ending 31st December 2023; 2024 and 2025 (estimated)
outcome
the management fee for 2023 and 2023 is reduced to £140 per annum.
items reduced
the management fee for 2023 and 2023 is reduced to £140 per annum.
s20c
The tribunal makes an order under section 20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.