37 Windrush Close, Pelsall, WS3 4LJ

BIR/41UK/LAC/2020/0005 · administration charges · Walsall · decided 19 Jan 2021

figures not yet checked

The tribunal found that the leaseholder is under no liability to pay the administration charges demanded by the landlord, and later ordered that the landlord's litigation costs cannot be added to the service charge and that litigation-cost administration charges are extinguished.

Outcome	Not payable
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)	Order made
Section 20 consultation	Not in issue
Who applied	Leaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlord	Wallace Partnership Reversionary Group Ltd
Management company	none named
Managing agent	none named
Building	A block
Service charge years in dispute	not stated
Items in dispute	administration charges
Items disallowed or reduced	administration charges
Total demanded	not stated as one figure
Total found payable	not stated as one figure
Fees or costs ordered	none stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

freeholder: Respondent : Wallace Partnership Reversionary Group Ltd
outcome: The Applicant is under no liability to pay any Administration Charges to the Respondent.
items reduced: The Applicant is under no liability to pay any Administration Charges to the Respondent.
s20c: I order that all costs incurred, or to be incurred, by the Respondent landlord in connection with these proceedings are not to be regarded as relevant costs

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.