37 Park Dale East, Wolverhampton, WV1 4TD
BIR/00CW/LDC/2023/0016 · dispensation from consultation · Wolverhampton · decided 10 Nov 2023
The Tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for urgent works to remove asbestos debris below apartment 1 and seal the area, without deciding whether the costs are payable or reasonable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Wallace Estates Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Premier Estates Limited |
| Building | A block, 6 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2000 |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
comprising of 6 self – contained apartments located over three floors
- freeholder
Applicant : Wallace Estates Limited
- agent
Representative : Premier Estates Limited (Vicki Cooper)
- outcome
The Tribunal grants dispensation from the consultation requirements of
- s20
The Tribunal grants dispensation from the consultation requirements of section 20 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 in respect of the Works to remove the top section of asbestos debris
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.