37 Marina Place, Hampton Wick, Kingston upon Thames, KT1 4BH
LON/00BD/LSC/2023/0094 · service charges · Richmond upon Thames · decided 20 May 2025
The tribunal found the balcony painting and lift repair charges payable and the Sky satellite charge not applicable, but ordered the car park charge recalculated on 75 spaces with the difference credited to the leaseholders, and refused a section 20C order.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Marina Place Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 |
| Items in dispute | other, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | other |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
The freehold is owned by Marina Place Ltd.
- years
from 2017/18 to 2024/25
- outcome
The Respondent should recalculate the charge made to the Applicants on the basis of 75 car parking spaces rather than 66 for each year in issue
- items reduced
The Respondent should recalculate the charge made to the Applicants on the basis of 75 car parking spaces rather than 66
- s20c
The Tribunal declines to make orders under section 20C of the 1985 Act
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.