37 Greystoke Court, Hanger Lane, London W5 1EN
LON/00AJ/LSC/2023/0470 · service charges · Ealing · decided 12 Sep 2025
The tribunal allowed some service charges for 2021 to 2024 in part, reducing insurance extras, fire door work, a managing agent fee and some lift and administration charges, while making no determination on the major works pending a proper specification and dispensation applications.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not clear |
| Section 20 consultation | Consultation failure found |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Albermarle Ealing No 1 Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | David Adams Surveyors Limited |
| Building | One flat, 4 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2024 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, insurance, major works, management fees, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | administration charges, insurance, management fees, repairs and maintenance |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Respondent : [name] No 1 Ltd
- agent
They have used [name] Surveyors Limited as managing agents.
- years
2024-2025
- outcome
The work had only partially been completed accordingly we consider that only the amount completed should be charged.
- items reduced
The extra sum will need to be deducted from the total.
- s20
for which proper consultation had not been carried out
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.