37 Gallivan Close, Little Stoke, Bristol BS34 6RW
CHI/00HD/LSC/2022/0064 · service charges · South Gloucestershire · decided 13 Dec 2022
The Tribunal found the leaseholder liable to pay the £7,692.30 on-account demand for the proposed major works, rejected the claimed set-off for replacement windows, and left the section 20C application to be decided after further submissions.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | Clay Croft Management Limited |
| Managing agent | HMLPM Limited |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2021 |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £7,692.30 |
| Total found payable | £7,692.30 |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
a block of twelve purpose built flats constructed in 1993/1994
- management company
The Respondent is Clay Croft Management Limited.
- agent
the managing agents for twelve flats at Clay Croft, 38 – 41 Gallivan Close, Little Stoke, Bristol. BS34 6RW.
- years
The Tribunal finds that the Applicant is liable to pay the service charges of £7,692.30 demanded by the Respondent in 2021 “on account” of the costs of the major works.
- outcome
The Tribunal finds that the Applicant is liable to pay the service charges of £7,692.30 demanded by the Respondent in 2021
- total demanded
The Tribunal finds that the Applicant is liable to pay the service charges of £7,692.30 demanded by the Respondent in 2021
- total payable
The Tribunal finds that the Applicant is liable to pay the service charges of £7,692.30 demanded by the Respondent in 2021
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.