37 Buckingham Road, Shoreham by Sea, West Sussex BN43 5UA
CHI/45UB/LVM/2021/0004 · variation of a management order · Adur · decided 14 Dec 2021
figures not yet checkedNo plain-English summary for this decision yet. See the original.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat · 2 decisions about this building |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | insurance, major works, repairs and maintenance, administration charges |
| Items disallowed or reduced | administration charges |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- outcome
We are satisfied that it remains just and convenient for manager to be appointed.
- s20c
Having said the above we do determine that an Order should be made pursuant to Section 20C and Mr [name] should not recover any of his costs of dealing with this application through the service charge.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.