Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near W1G 9TN

37-41 New Cavendish Street, London, W1G 9TN

LON/00BK/LDC/2021/0227 · dispensation from consultation · Westminster · decided 8 Nov 2021

The tribunal granted the freeholder dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for replacing the building's boiler, as only one tender was received and the works were urgent before winter.

OutcomeOther decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationDispensation granted
Who appliedLandlord or management company
Freeholder / landlordHoward De Walden Estates Limited
Management companynone named
Managing agentnone named
BuildingA block, 8 flats
Service charge years in disputenot stated
Items in disputerepairs and maintenance
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
The Applicant is the freeholder of a block containing 8 flats
freeholder
Applicant Howard De Walden Estates Limited
outcome
The Tribunal grants dispensation from all of the consultation requirements under S.20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
s20
The Tribunal grants dispensation from all of the consultation requirements under S.20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 in relation to the replacement of the boiler in the building.

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.