37-39 Gordon Road, Cliftonville, Margate, Kent, CT9 2DW
CHI/29UN/LDC/2020/0090 · dispensation from consultation · Thanet · decided 7 Jan 2021
The tribunal granted dispensation from the consultation requirements for emergency works to a parapet wall, on condition that leaseholders' contribution is limited to £7,002.50 and the landlord bears the council fees of £1,183.91 and its own application costs.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Southern Land Securities Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Together Property Management |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £8,186.41 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the applicant bears its own costs of the section 20ZA application, not to be recovered through the service charge |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Applicant : Southern Land Securities Limited
- agent
Representative : Together Property Management
- outcome
An order for dispensation from consultation requirements is made in respect of the works to the parapet wall between 37 and 39 Gordon Road subject to the following conditions
- total demanded
the total sum of £8186.41 represented costs of qualifying works upon which the Applicant was obliged to consult the leaseholders
- s20
An order for dispensation from consultation requirements is made in respect of the works to the parapet wall between 37 and 39 Gordon Road subject to the following conditions
- costs
The Applicant should bear the costs of the section 20ZA Application to the Tribunal and not recover the costs from the leaseholders through the service charge.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.