36 Silverthorne Loft Apartments, 400 Albany Road, London SE5 0DJ
LON/00BE/LSC/2020/0230 · service charges · Southwark · decided 2 Dec 2020
The tribunal dismissed the tenant's application, finding that under the lease the landlord is responsible for repairing and decorating the external parts of the building including the windows, so the charges are payable and reasonable, and the request for a section 20C order was refused.
| Outcome | Dismissed or struck out |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Silverthorne RTM Company Limited |
| Management company | Silverthorne RTM Company Limited |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 36 flats · 2 decisions about this building |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2019, 2020 |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £6,324 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
converted school into 36 residential units
- freeholder
Silverthorne RTM Company Limited
- management company
Silverthorne RTM Company Limited
- years
£3162 charged for 2019 and the same for 2020
- outcome
The Application is dismissed.
- total demanded
the amount in dispute is £6324
- s20c
the Applicant’s application under s.20C Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 is refused
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.