35A Boyn Valley Road, Maidenhead, SL6 4DT
CAM/00ME/LSC/2025/0610 · service charges · Windsor and Maidenhead · decided 16 Feb 2026
The tribunal found that the interim service charge demand of £33,000 for roof and external rendering works was reasonable and payable by the leaseholder, with no order for refund of tribunal fees.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Newtown Estates Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 2 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2024 |
| Items in dispute | other, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £33,000 |
| Total found payable | £33,000 |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The subject property at 35 Boyn Valley Road, Maidenhead is a detached house that has been divided into two flats.
- freeholder
Respondent : Newtown Estates Limited
- years
in respect of the 2024 service charge year.
- outcome
The tribunal determines that the sum of £33,000 is payable by the Applicant to the Respondent in respect of the interim service charge demand dated 19 November 2024.
- total demanded
demand dated 19 November 2024 in the sum of £33,000
- total payable
the sum of £33,000 is payable by the Applicant to the Respondent
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.