357 Charlestown Road, Moston M9 7BS
MAN/00BN/LSC/2018/0017 · service charges · Manchester · decided 28 Mar 2023
The tribunal found the 2016/17 and 2017/18 service charges payable as agreed between the parties, with the insurance element payable for the respondent fixed at £135.95 for each year.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Contour Property Services Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | An estate |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2016, 2017 |
| Items in dispute | cleaning and grounds, insurance, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | insurance |
| Total demanded | £757.15 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Contour Property Services Limited (Contour) apply under Section 27A
- years
The service charges claimed for 2016/2017 and 2017/2018 are payable to the extent now agreed between the parties
- outcome
we conclude that the element of insurance payable by [name] by way of service charge for each year is £135.95.
- items reduced
we conclude that the element of insurance payable by [name] by way of service charge for each year is £135.95.
- total demanded
The Applicant issued a claim at the County Court in respect of unpaid service charges of £757.15.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.