357-361 Harrow Road, London W9 3NA

LON/00BK/LSC/2019/0336 · service charges · Westminster · decided 24 Sep 2020

The tribunal found that the proposed cyclical roof works costs are payable by the lessees because the roof falls within the demise under the headlease, and it made a section 20C order limiting recovery of 90% of the landlord's proceedings costs.

Outcome	Payable as demanded
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)	Order made
Section 20 consultation	Not in issue
Who applied	Landlord or management company
Freeholder / landlord	Notting Hill Home Ownership Limited
Management company	none named
Managing agent	none named
Building	A block, 9 flats
Service charge years in dispute	not stated
Items in dispute	major works
Items disallowed or reduced	none stated
Total demanded	not stated as one figure
Total found payable	not stated as one figure
Fees or costs ordered	none stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

freeholder: Applicant : Notting Hill Home Ownership Limited
outcome: The Tribunal finds that the costs which form the subject matter of this application are payable by the First Respondents.
s20c: The Tribunal makes an order under section 20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 that 90% of the Applicant’s costs in connection with these proceedings are not to be regarded as relevant costs

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.