Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near SE26 5SL

351-355 Sydenham Road, Sydenham, London SE26 5SL

LON/00AZ/LDC/2019/0146 · dispensation from consultation · Lewisham · decided 7 Oct 2019

The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for replacing two sump pumps at 351-355 Sydenham Road, while noting that the leaseholders' future right to challenge the reasonableness of the costs is unaffected.

OutcomeOther decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationDispensation granted
Who appliedLandlord or management company
Freeholder / landlordDEP Limited
Management companynone named
Managing agentAcorn Estate Management
BuildingA block, 9 flats
Service charge years in disputenot stated
Items in disputeother
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
The Applicant is the freeholder and the landlord of 9 flats at 351-355 Sydenham Road
freeholder
Applicant : DEP Limited
agent
The Applicant's representative, [name] of Acorn Estate Management, manages the building.
outcome
(1) Dispensation is granted pursuant to section 20ZA of the Landlord & Tenant Act 1985.
s20
Dispensation is granted pursuant to section 20ZA of the Landlord & Tenant Act 1985.

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.