Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near B3 1QX

35 St Pauls Square, Birmingham, B3 1QX

BIR/00CN/LDC/2023/0008 · dispensation from consultation · Birmingham · decided 22 Nov 2023

figures not yet checked

The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for the emergency replacement of a failed automatic opening vent at the property, without prejudice to any later challenge to the cost under section 27A.

OutcomeOther decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationDispensation granted
Who appliedLandlord or management company
Freeholder / landlordCity Spirit Investments (St Pauls) Limited
Management companyCSI (St Pauls) Management Company Ltd
Managing agentnone named
BuildingA block
Service charge years in disputenot stated
Items in disputerepairs and maintenance
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
let on long leases to four lessees
freeholder
(2) City Spirit Investments (St Pauls) Limited
management company
Applicant : CSI (St Pauls) Management Company Ltd
s20
we grant dispensation from consultation for the Works

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.