Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near WD4 8AB

35 High Street, Kings Langley, WD48AB

CAM/26UC/LIS/2022/0003 · LIS · Dacorum · decided 18 Oct 2022

figures not yet checked

The tribunal found the insurance premium and water and sewerage charges claimed from the leaseholders reasonable and payable, and refused the leaseholders' request that the landlord's costs not be added to the service charge.

OutcomeDismissed or struck out
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Refused
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedLeaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlordPurbeck Holdings Limited
Management companynone named
Managing agentnone named
BuildingOne flat
Service charge years in dispute2020, 2021
Items in disputeinsurance, utilities
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

freeholder
The Respondent is Purbeck Holdings Limited
years
The Applicants are challenging service charges for the period 2020 until 2022.
outcome
The Respondent has been successful and has been put to cost in defending a challenge which is misconceived for the reasons given in this determination.
s20c
The Tribunal will not exercise its discretion under s.20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act.

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.