35 - 36 Hamilton Square, Birkenhead CH41 5BP

MAN/00CB/LDC/2025/0608 · dispensation from consultation · Wirral · decided 27 Jun 2025

figures not yet checked

The tribunal dismissed the RTM company's application to dispense with the consultation requirements for urgent roof works at 35 - 36 Hamilton Square, because it was not satisfied that the works were shown to be required or that leaseholders would be protected from prejudice.

Outcome	Dismissed or struck out
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)	Not applied for
Section 20 consultation	Dispensation refused
Who applied	RTM company
Freeholder / landlord	not a company, or not stated
Management company	none named
Managing agent	MVN Block Management Limited
Building	A block, 15 flats
Service charge years in dispute	not stated
Items in dispute	major works
Items disallowed or reduced	none stated
Total demanded	not stated as one figure
Total found payable	not stated as one figure
Fees or costs ordered	none stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n: The Property consists of 15 individual apartments.
agent: MVN Block Management Limited
outcome: The Application is dismissed.
s20: the Tribunal is not satisfied that it is reasonable to dispense with the consultation requirements

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.